Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 (UK)

Product Information

Although section 25 of the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 already gives English courts the power to grant injunctive relief in support of foreign jurisdictions (in conjunction with specific gateway for service of such claims under CPR PD 6B 3. That is explained by the convenience of putting together in one instrument a number of related conventions. While the Regulation is not expressed to be mandatory, it is understood that the foreign process section would likely treat it as such.

It makes only those changes to the 1982 Act which are directly consequent upon Greek accession to the Brussels Convention: it makes no changes of substance. There is an exception however, where the parties to the consumer contract agree otherwise once the dispute has arisen, or where they had agreed to allow the consumer to bring proceedings in some other court (CJJA section 15(B)(6)). In the overwhelming majority of cases, this is a non-issue, however where the two parties are located in different countries and/or legal jurisdictions, this can be a vital issue for the court to determine.After Brexit, the situation is different, and this article describes the provisions for service out of jurisdiction that now apply under the Civil Procedure Rules (‘CPR’). The 12 states have also undertaken to ratify the Spanish and Portuguese accession convention before the end of 1992.

Should the Convention come into force, the rules for service out of jurisdiction will likely shift again to most probably mirror the pre-Brexit position.Although it does not appear to have been tested, one would assume that a similar position would be taken by the courts in respect of civil proceedings in EU member states, where the Taking of Evidence Regulation currently governs the position, rather than the 1975 Act. In the context of Brexit, the Regulation will continue to apply to the UK until the end of the transition period. However, the Court's obiter comments in relation to the power to grant freezing injunctions outside of the jurisdiction were ground-breaking in their departure from the position in The Siskina. Secondly, one can make the general point that the effectiveness of any such international provision depends on the width of its application and the reciprocity and uniformity of its application.

Claims which would have been capable of being pursued in the UK under the EOP or ESCP Regulations prior to the end of the transition period need to be made in the appropriate court as ordinary civil claims. The retained versions of Rome I and Rome II Regulations also apply to determine applicable law in the case of intra-UK conflicts of laws (or conflicts of laws between the UK and Gibraltar), where the contract is concluded, or the events giving rise to the damage occurred, before the end of the transition period.Even if the noble and learned Lord is not able to answer the question of the noble and learned Lord, Lord Elwyn-Jones, I hope that the Government have in place some mechanism for monitoring the working and the weaknesses, if any, of the 1982 Act so that there can be a continuous consideration of how it works in practice. An employee carrying out work in the UK can bring proceedings against the employer in the courts of that part of the UK (for instance, the English court), regardless of where the employer is domiciled (CJJA section 15(C)(2)), without requiring permission for service out of the jurisdiction (CPR Rule 6. RAKIA put its then CEO, Dr Khater Massaad, in charge of these plans who in turn appointed Mr Gela Mikadze to develop these opportunities.

Legislation dealing with the “Rome” rules on applicable law is contained in the following statutory instrument: The Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations and Non-Contractual Obligations (Amendment etc. I should say that Section 3 already permits reference to the corresponding reports on the Brussels Convention and on the earlier accession convention—that is, the 1978 convention under which the United Kingdom acceded, and this Greek report completes the picture.Practitioners should note, however, that both the Rome I and Rome II Regulations apply whether or not the applicable law is the law of an EU member state or not (see Article 2 of Rome I and Article 3 of Rome II). g. those of Brussels Ia and Lugano respectively) where the parties have concluded a court settlement, or formally drawn up or registered an “authentic instrument”, before the end of the transition period, and recognition and enforcement is sought after that date in England or Wales. A consumer domiciled in the UK, can bring a claim against the other party to the consumer contract in the courts where the consumer is domiciled (for instance, the English court), regardless of the other party’s domicile (CJJA section 15(B)(2)). To that I have no objection and practitioners and those who have to apply these measures will welcome it. The Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (SI 2019/479), which came into force at the end of the transition period (11pm on 31 December 2020), set out a number of amendments to legislation in the field of civil judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters, including rules of jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement of judgments.